QSO 640: Case Study TwoGuidelines and Rubric
QSO 640: Case Study TwoGuidelines and Rubric
Prompt:The goal of the project execution, reporting, and managing resources case study is to apply the project management knowledge you have gained in the course and to challenge you to critically apply knowledge gained in a real-project situation. The analysisshould include evaluation of the following:
- Project Schedule and Cost Management
- Evaluation of the project manager’scompression of the project schedule
- Evaluation of the project cost and schedule variances
- Project Conflict and Team Management
- Managing project conflict
- Team management
- Stakeholder Engagement and Resource Allocation
- Project manager communication and stakeholder engagement
- Human resource allocation and management
Requirements of submission: Evaluation of the case study should be approximately 750 words, using 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, one-inch margins, and a minimum of two references in APA format.
Instructor feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
Need assignment help for this question?
If you need assistance with writing your essay, we are ready to help you!
OUR PROCESS
Order
Payment
Writing
Delivery
Why Choose Us: Cost-efficiency, Plagiarism free, Money Back Guarantee, On-time Delivery, Total Сonfidentiality, 24/7 Support, 100% originality
| Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
| Project Schedule and Cost Management | Meets “Proficient” criteria and adds examples of each from real-world experience (27-30) | Evaluates the project schedule and cost management processes, providing in-depth information of project management concepts (24-26) | Evaluates the project schedule and cost management processes, providing a broad overview and missing key details (21-23) | Does not evaluate project schedule and cost management processes within the case study (0-20) | 30 |
| Project Conflict and Team Management | Meets “Proficient” criteria and brings examples into the discussion (27-30) | Analyzes project conflict and team management within the case study, highlighting key concepts (24-26) | Analyzes project conflict and team management within the case study; does not highlight key concepts or does so with gaps in information (21-23) | Does not evaluate project conflict and team management within the case study (0-20) | 30 |
| Stakeholder Engagement and Resource Allocation | Meets “Proficient” criteria and adds examples of real-world experience (27-30) | Analyzes and provides details of stakeholder engagement and resource allocation processes within the case study (24-26) | Analyzes stakeholder engagement and resource allocation processes within the case study, missing supportive details (21-23) | Does not evaluate stakeholder engagement and resource allocation processes within the case study (0-20) | 30 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format (9-10) | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization (8) | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas (7) | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas (0-6) | 10 |
| Earned Total Comments: | 100% |
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"
